Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 58 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Ross.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Ross Anchor | green | “it is a cardinal rule of appellate review that a party may not challenge as error a ruling or other trial proceeding invited by that party.” | 31 |
| 2 | United States v. Stone | green | “the doctrine of invited error is implicated when a party induces or invites the district court into making an error.” | 18 |
| 3 | Ford v. Garcia | green | “where invited error exists, it precludes a court from invoking the plain error rule and reversing.” | 6 |
| 4 | West Peninsular Title Co. v. Palm Beach County | green | “venue was proper under 28 u.s.c. 1391 .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.