Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 58 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Vega v. T-MOBILE USA, INC..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vega v. T-MOBILE USA, INC. Anchor | green | “(1) the existence of a contract; (2) a material breach of that contract; and (3) damages resulting from the breach.” | 25 |
| 2 | Vega v. T-MOBILE USA, INC. | green | “for a breach of contract claim, florida law requires the plaintiff to plead and establish: (1) the existence of a contract; (2) a material breach of that contract; and (3) damages resulting from the breach.” | 19 |
| 3 | Vega v. T-MOBILE USA, INC. | green | “to prove the existence of a contract, a plaintiff must plead: (1) offer; (2) acceptance; (3) consideration; and (4) sufficient specification of the essential terms.” | 11 |
| 4 | L & H Construction Co. v. Circle Redmont, Inc. | green | “a valid contract-premised on the parties' requisite willingness to contract-may be 'manifested through written or spoken words, or inferred in whole or in part from the parties' conduct.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.