Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 58 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McDade v. Siazon.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McDade v. Siazon Anchor | green | “imposes strict requirements upon litigants seeking to file claims against public entities.” | 15 |
| 2 | D.D. v. University of Medicine & Dentistry | green | “although deference will ordinarily be given to the factual findings that undergird the trial court's decision, the court's conclusions will be overturned if they were reached under a misconception of the law.” | 11 |
| 3 | Beauchamp v. Amedio | green | “once the date of accrual is ascertained, one can proceed to the second step, which 'is to determine whether a notice of claim was filed within ninety days' as required by n.j.s.a. 59:8-8.” | 8 |
| 4 | O'Donnell v. N.J. Tpk. Auth. | green | “the discretion of a judge of the superior court” | 8 |
| 5 | Beauchamp v. Amedio | green | “the first step is to determine when the cause of action accrued in accordance with n.j.s.a. 59:8-1.” | 7 |
| 6 | Lowe v. Zarghami | green | “for a case-by-case determination . . . whether the reasons given rise to the level of 'extraordinary' on the facts presented.” | 5 |
| 7 | Feinberg v. STATE, DEP | green | “as to whether extraordinary circumstances exist” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.