Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 58 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Barber Ex Rel. Barber v. Colorado Dept. of Revenue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barber Ex Rel. Barber v. Colorado Dept. of Revenue Anchor | green | “the court has misapprehended the facts, a party's position, or the controlling law.” | 23 |
| 2 | Somerlott v. Cherokee Nation Distributors, Inc. | green | “grounds for granting a rule 59(e) motion include '(1) an intervening change in the controlling law, (2) new evidence previously unavailable, and (3) the need to correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” | 22 |
| 3 | Barber Ex Rel. Barber v. Colorado Dept. of Revenue | green | “misapprehended the facts, a party's position, or the controlling law.” | 13 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.