Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 58 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Decker Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Decker Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison Company Anchor | green | “the defendant must make a strong showing of inconvenience to warrant upsetting the plaintiff's choice of forum.” | 16 |
| 2 | No. 99-55633 | green | “individualized, case-by-case consideration of convenience and fairness.” | 13 |
| 3 | Decker Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison Company | green | “strong showing of inconvenience” | 9 |
| 4 | Jennifer L. Passantino v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Order And Products, Inc. | green | “venue is proper in both the forum where the employment decision is made and the forum in which that decision is implemented or its effects are felt.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.