Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 58 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tenenbaum v. Williams.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tenenbaum v. Williams Anchor | green | “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” | 28 |
| 2 | Jamal Stephenson v. John Doe | green | “qualified immunity is an affirmative defense that shields government officials 'from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” | 12 |
| 3 | Dangler v. New York City Off Track Betting Corporation | green | “a government's official policy may be 'made by its lawmakers or by those whose edicts or acts may fairly be said to represent official policy.” | 7 |
| 4 | Soares v. State of Connecticut | green | “careful attention to the facts and circumstances of each particular case, including the severity of the crime at issue, whether the subject poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or others, and whether he is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arres…” | 6 |
| 5 | Shamir v. City of New York | green | “are properly analyzed under the fourth amendment's 'objective reasonableness' standard.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.