Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 58 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Bass.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Bass Anchor | green | “any formula, pattern, device or compilation of information which is used in one's business and presents an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use it.” | 27 |
| 2 | In Re Union Pacific Railroad | green | “necessary or essential to the fair adjudication of the case.” | 5 |
| 3 | In Re Union Pacific Railroad | green | “stated conclusively what would or would not be considered necessary for a fair adjudication, indicating instead that the application of the test would depend on the circumstances presented.” | 5 |
| 4 | In Re Union Pacific Railroad | green | “the mere possibility of unfairness is not enough to warrant disclosure” | 5 |
| 5 | John Paul Mitchell Systems v. Randalls Food Markets, Inc. | green | “carefully compiled and closely guarded” | 5 |
| 6 | In Re Bass | green | “fit neatly into each factor every time” | 5 |
| 7 | T-N-T Motorsports, Inc. v. Hennessey Motorsports, Inc. | green | “items such as customer lists, pricing information, client information, customer preferences, buyer contacts, market strategies, blueprints, and drawings have been shown to be trade secrets.” | 3 |
| 8 | In Re Continental General Tire, Inc. | green | “a clear failure by the trial court to analyze or apply the law correctly will constitute an abuse of discretion, and may result in appellate reversal by extraordinary writ” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.