Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 58 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Maples v. West Virginia Department of Commerce.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maples v. West Virginia Department of Commerce Anchor | green | “a litigant may not silently acquiesce to an alleged error, or actively contribute to such error, and then raise that error as a reason for reversal on appeal.” | 26 |
| 2 | State v. Riley | green | “a judgment will not be reversed for any error in the record introduced by or invited by the party seeking reversal.” | 10 |
| 3 | Shamblin v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance | green | “the appellant cannot benefit from the consequences of error it invited” | 5 |
| 4 | Shamblin v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance | green | “the appellant cannot benefit from the consequences of error it invited.” | 3 |
| 5 | Young v. Young | green | “a judgment will not be reversed for any error in the record introduced by or invited by the party seeking reversal.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.