Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 58 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thiele v. Stich.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thiele v. Stich Anchor | green | “a reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” | 35 |
| 2 | Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America v. Gordon Brown | green | “summary judgment is appropriate when the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, establishes that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 14 |
| 3 | Dukowitz v. Hannon Security Services | green | “determining whether any genuine issues of material fact exist and whether the district court erred in its application of the law,” | 5 |
| 4 | Dukowitz v. Hannon Security Services | green | “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted to determine whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court correctly applied the law.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.