Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 58 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Felicia Strothers v. City of Laurel, Maryland.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Felicia Strothers v. City of Laurel, Maryland Anchor | green | “establishing a 'causal relationship' at the prima facie stage is not an onerous burden.” | 22 |
| 2 | Felicia Strothers v. City of Laurel, Maryland | green | “an employee may establish prima facie causation simply by showing that (1) the employer either understood or should have understood the employee to be engaged in protected activity and (2) the employer took adverse action against the employee soon after becoming aware of such ac…” | 22 |
| 3 | Chazz Roberts v. Glenn Industrial Group, Inc. | green | “a plaintiff may establish the existence of facts that 'suggest that the adverse action occurred because of the protected activity.” | 14 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.