Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 57 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Duncan v. Henry.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duncan v. Henry Anchor | green | “if state courts are to be given the opportunity to correct alleged violations of prisoners' federal rights, they must surely be alerted to the fact that the prisoners are asserting claims under the united states constitution.” | 45 |
| 2 | Robert Anthony Preston, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections | green | “the crux of the exhaustion requirement is simply that the petitioner must have put the state court on notice that he intended to raise a federal claim.” | 12 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.