Topic: correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly … · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #609

7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 355 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Max's Seafood Cafe, By Lou-Ann, Inc. v. Max Quinteros.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Max's Seafood Cafe, By Lou-Ann, Inc. v. Max Quinteros Anchor
ca3 · 1999
green “correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence.” 111
2 Max's Seafood Cafe, By Lou-Ann, Inc. v. Max Quinteros
ca3 · 1999
green “to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence.” 65
3 Brambles USA, Inc. v. Blocker
ded · 1990
green “as a means to argue new facts or issues that inexcusably were not presented to the court in the matter previously decided.” 59
4 Brambles USA, Inc. v. Blocker
ded · 1990
green “the court has patently misunderstood a party, or has made a decision outside the adversarial issues presented to the court by the parties, or has made an error not of reasoning but of apprehension.” 50
5 Lazaridis v. Wehmer
ca3 · 2010
green “a proper rule 59(e) motion . . . must rely on one of three grounds: (1) an intervening change in controlling law; (2) the availability of new evidence; or (3) the need to correct a clear error of law or fact or to prevent manifest injustice.” 36
6 Lazaridis v. Wehmer
ca3 · 2010
green “(1) an intervening change in controlling law; (2) the availability of new evidence; or (3) the need to correct clear error of law or prevent manifest injustice.” 27
7 Douris v. Schweiker
paed · 2002
green “because federal courts have a strong interest in finality of judgments, motions for reconsideration should be granted sparingly.” 7

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check