5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 44 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Colleen Macort v. Prem, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colleen Macort v. Prem, Inc. Anchor | green | “where a proper, specific objection to the magistrate judge's report is made, it is clear that the district court must conduct a de novo review of that issue.” | 22 |
| 2 | Winschel v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “we may not decide the facts anew, reweigh the evidence, or substitute our judgment for that of the .” | 7 |
| 3 | Deborah Ann Packer v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration | green | “e may not reweigh the evidence or substitute our judgment for that of the alj.” | 6 |
| 4 | Jack Bloodsworth v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services | green | “in reviewing claims brought under the social security act, role is a limited one. may not decide the facts anew, reweigh the evidence, or substitute judgment for that of the secretary.” | 5 |
| 5 | Ollie G. CHESTER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee | green | “exhausted his administrative remedies whereupon the alj's determination became the secretary's final decision.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.