Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 56 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wilkinson v. Lee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wilkinson v. Lee Anchor | green | “regardless of the preexisting condition, recovery is allowed if the trauma caused by the accident triggered symptoms from that condition.” | 14 |
| 2 | Weymers v. Khera | green | “to establish proximate cause, the plaintiff must prove the existence of both cause in fact and legal cause.” | 13 |
| 3 | Weymers v. Khera | green | “present substantial evidence from which a jury may conclude that more likely than not, but for the defendant's conduct, the plaintiff's injuries would not have occurred.” | 12 |
| 4 | Weymers v. Khera | green | “to establish legal cause, the plaintiff must show that it was foreseeable that the defendant's conduct may create a risk of harm to the victim, and . . . that the result of that conduct and intervening causes were foreseeable.” | 9 |
| 5 | Doe v. Henry Ford Health System | green | “the party asserting a breach of contract has the burden of proving its damages with reasonable certainty, and may recover only those damages that are the direct, natural, and proximate result of the breach.” | 5 |
| 6 | Wilson v. Alpena County Road Commission | green | “establishes a logical sequence of cause and effect, notwithstanding the existence of other plausible theories, although other plausible theories may also have evidentiary support.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.