Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 56 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Turkmen v. Ashcroft.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Turkmen v. Ashcroft Anchor | green | “a claim has facial plausibility when the claimant pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” | 20 |
| 2 | Trustees of the Upstate New York Engineers Pension Fund v. Ivy Asset Management | green | “accepting all factual allegations as true and drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of the claimant.” | 19 |
| 3 | Nielsen v. AECOM Technology Corp. | green | “to state a plausible claim, the pleading's 'factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.” | 17 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.