Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 56 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Merrick v. Farmers Insurance Group.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Merrick v. Farmers Insurance Group Anchor | green | “a bright, intelligent, knowledgeable young man” | 22 |
| 2 | Marsha Godwin v. Hunt Wesson, Inc., a Delaware Corporation | green | “direct evidence is evidence which, if believed, proves the fact of discriminatory animus without inference or presumption.” | 15 |
| 3 | Mary Bradley v. Harcourt, Brace and Company | green | “where the same actor is responsible for both the hiring and the firing of a discrimination plaintiff, and both actions occur within a short period of time, a strong inference arises that there was no discriminatory motive.” | 14 |
| 4 | Merrick v. Farmers Insurance Group | green | “bright, intelligent, knowledgeable young man” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.