Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 56 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bolden v. Com..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bolden v. Com. Anchor | green | “when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, the court will affirm the judgment unless the judgment is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.” | 25 |
| 2 | Bolden v. Com. | green | “the commonwealth must present evidence of acts, statements, or conduct by the defendant or other facts and circumstances proving that the defendant was aware of the presence and character of the firearm and that the firearm was subject to his dominion and control.” | 16 |
| 3 | Britt v. Com. | green | “the evidence in the light most favorable to the commonwealth, the prevailing party in the circuit court, and we accord the commonwealth the benefit of all reasonable inferences deducible from the evidence.” | 12 |
| 4 | Jones v. Com. | green | “is plainly wrong or without evidentiary support.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.