Topic: because of their very potency, inherent powers must be exer… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #632

10 canonical passages across 9 cases, quoted by 344 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Chambers v. Nasco, Inc..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. Anchor
scotus · 1991
green “because of their very potency, inherent powers must be exercised with restraint and discretion.” 170
2 Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.
scotus · 1991
green “acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons.” 101
3 Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper
scotus · 1980
green “because inherent powers are shielded from direct democratic controls, they must be exercised with restraint and discretion.” 37
4 Neal Secrease, Jr. v. Western & Southern Life Insura
ca7 · 2015
green “courts generally have an interest in both punishing a party's dishonesty and deterring others who might consider similar misconduct.” 9
5 First Bank of Marietta, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
ca1 · 2002
green “imposition of inherent power sanctions requires a finding of bad faith,” 7
6 Nasco, Inc. v. Calcasieu Television and Radio, Inc., and G. Russell Chambers, and Richard A. Curry, Edwin A. McCabe and A.J. Gray, III
ca5 · 1990
green “is not a broad reservoir of power, ready at an imperial hand, but a limited source; an implied power squeezed from the need to make the court function.” 6
7 Boneck v. City of New Berlin
ca7 · 2001
green “spoliation that sabotages a strong case supports default judgment.” 4
8 Mitan v. International Fidelity Insurance
ca6 · 2001
green “history of forum shopping and abusing the legal process” 4
9 In Re Yorkshire, LLC
ca5 · 2008
green “a federal court, acting under its inherent authority, may impose sanctions against litigants or lawyers appearing before the court so long as the court makes a specific finding that they engaged in bad faith conduct.” 3
10 Cohen v. US DIST. COURT FOR ND OF CAL.
ca9 · 2009
green “a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check