Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 55 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Robert Lodholtz v. York Risk Services Group, Inco.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robert Lodholtz v. York Risk Services Group, Inco Anchor | green | “state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” | 24 |
| 2 | Ronald Forgue v. City of Chicago | green | “accepts as true all of the well-pleaded facts in the complaint and draws all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff.” | 10 |
| 3 | Robert Lodholtz v. York Risk Services Group, Inco | green | “in order to survive a motion to dismiss under rule 12(b)(6), a complaint must 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” | 8 |
| 4 | Ebner v. Fresh, Inc. | green | “it is likely to mislead a reasonable consumer in a material respect, even if it is not literally false.” | 7 |
| 5 | Lee v. Ne. Ill. Reg'l Commuter R.R. Corp. | green | “even a complaint that passes muster under the liberal notice pleading requirements of federal rule of civil procedure 8(a)(2) can be subject to dismissal if a plaintiff does not provide argument in support of the legal adequacy of the complaint.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.