Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 55 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Iroquois Gas Transmission System v. Mileski.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iroquois Gas Transmission System v. Mileski Anchor | neutral | “section 440 . . . cannot be used to attack findings of fact.” | 18 |
| 2 | Iroquois Gas Transmission System v. Mileski | neutral | “absent . . . an exception to the report, the trial court, in ruling on the objection, is limited to determining whether the subordinate facts were sufficient to support the ultimate factual conclusions.” | 15 |
| 3 | TDS Painting & Restoration, Inc. v. Copper Beech Farm, Inc. | green | “cannot find additional facts or reject others unless a material fact has been found without evidence.” | 14 |
| 4 | National Elevator Industry Pension, Welfare & Educational Fund v. Scrivani | green | “the attorney trial referee sits only as a fact finder.” | 4 |
| 5 | Tarka v. Filipovic | green | “failure to comply with the rules of practice governing procedures by which a party may challenge the findings of fact and factual conclusions of the attorney referee proves fatal to this claim.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.