Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 54 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Duffie v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duffie v. United States Anchor | green | “articulate the manner in which that evidence supports that party's claim.” | 22 |
| 2 | Nola Spice Designs, L.L.C. v. Haydel Enterprises, Inc. | green | “the moving party bears the initial responsibility of informing the district court of the basis for its motion, and identifying those portions of the record which it believes demonstrate the absence of a genuine issue of material fact.” | 17 |
| 3 | Nicole Burton v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., et | green | “a factual issue is genuine if the evidence is sufficient for a reasonable jury to return a verdict for the non-moving party, and material if its resolution could affect the outcome of the action.” | 5 |
| 4 | Luv N' Care, Limited v. Groupo Rimar | green | “summary judgment is proper only when the record demonstrates that no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 4 |
| 5 | Celtic Marine Corp. v. James C. Justice Companies, Inc. | green | “where the nonmoving party bears the burden of proof at trial, the moving party satisfies this initial burden by demonstrating an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving party's case.” | 3 |
| 6 | Thomas Edwards v. Continental Casualty Company | green | “consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and draw all reasonable inferences in its favor.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.