Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 54 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Healy v. Beer Institute.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Healy v. Beer Institute Anchor | green | “the critical inquiry is whether the practical effect of the regulation is to control conduct beyond the boundaries of the state.” | 18 |
| 2 | Healy v. Beer Institute | green | “a statute that directly controls commerce occurring wholly outside the boundaries of a state exceeds the inherent limits of the enacting state's authority and is invalid regardless of whether the statute's extraterritorial reach was intended by the legislature.” | 10 |
| 3 | Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority | green | “there is no clear line separating the category of state regulation that is virtually per se invalid under the commerce clause, and the category subject to the pike v. bruce church balancing approach.” | 9 |
| 4 | Healy v. Beer Institute | green | “the constitution's special concern both with the maintenance of a national economic union unfettered by state-imposed limitations on interstate commerce and with the autonomy of the individual states within their respective spheres.” | 9 |
| 5 | Wyoming v. Oklahoma | green | “the volume of commerce affected measures only the extent of the discrimination; it is of no relevance to the determination whether a state has discriminated against interstate commerce.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.