Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 54 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Guilfoile v. Shields.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guilfoile v. Shields Anchor | green | “must evaluate whether the complaint adequately pleads facts that 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” | 24 |
| 2 | United States v. Lahey Clinic Hospital, Inc. | green | “a motion to dismiss an action under rule 12(b)(1) . . . raises the fundamental question whether the federal district court has subject matter jurisdiction over the action before it.” | 10 |
| 3 | Zell v. Ricci | green | “first, 'isolate and ignore statements in the complaint that simply offer legal labels and conclusions or merely rehash cause-of-action elements,' then 'take the complaint's well-pled (i.e., non-conclusory, non-speculative) facts as true, drawing all reasonable inferences in the …” | 8 |
| 4 | Wall v. Dion | green | “consider other filings by a self-represented plaintiff, 'including the response to the motion to dismiss, to understand the nature and basis of his claims” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.