Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 54 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Official Committee Of The Unsecured Creditors Of Color Tile, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, Llp.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Official Committee Of The Unsecured Creditors Of Color Tile, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, Llp Anchor | green | “a complaint can be dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to a rule 12(b)(6) motion raising an affirmative defense if the defense appears on the face of the complaint.” | 11 |
| 2 | Picard v. Katz | green | “it is patent that all of madoff securities' transfers during the two-year period were made with actual intent to defraud present and future creditors, i.e., those left holding the bag when the scheme was uncovered.” | 8 |
| 3 | In re: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC | green | “section 546(e) sets a low bar for the required relationship between the securities contract and the transfer sought to be avoided.” | 7 |
| 4 | Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc. | green | “mere 'conduit' for the transmission of the margin payments.” | 7 |
| 5 | Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc. | green | “to maximize the funds available for, and ensure equity in, the distribution to creditors in a bankruptcy proceeding. . . .” | 7 |
| 6 | Picard v. Katz | green | “because madoff securities was a registered stockbrokerage firm, the liabilities of customers . . . are subject to the 'safe harbor' set forth in section 546(e) of the bankruptcy code,” | 7 |
| 7 | Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (In re Madoff Securities) | green | “subsequent transferee . . . may raise any defenses to avoidance available to the initial transferee, as well as any defenses to recovery it may have.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.