Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 53 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Bartile Roofs, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Bartile Roofs, Inc. Anchor | green | “the plaintiff's choice of forum receives less deference, however, if the plaintiff does not reside in the district.” | 20 |
| 2 | William B. Scheidt and Wanda C. Scheidt v. William Randolph Klein | green | “merely shifting the inconvenience from one side to the other, however, obviously is not a permissible justification for a change of venue.” | 17 |
| 3 | Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Bartile Roofs, Inc. | green | “courts also accord little weight to a plaintiff's choice of forum where the facts giving rise to the lawsuit have no material relation or significant connection to the plaintiff's chosen forum.” | 16 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.