Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 53 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mike Elkins v. Secretary of Health and Human Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mike Elkins v. Secretary of Health and Human Services Anchor | green | “is supported by substantial evidence, then we must affirm the commissioner's decision, even though as triers of fact we might have arrived at a different result.” | 20 |
| 2 | Annie E. FOSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee | green | “substantial evidence means more than a mere scintilla, but only so much as would be required to prevent a directed verdict.” | 10 |
| 3 | John M. Valley v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “are supported by substantial evidence.” | 10 |
| 4 | Stephen F. WILCOX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis D. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee | green | “we review the evidence in the record taken as a whole.” | 7 |
| 5 | Stephen F. WILCOX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis D. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee | green | “whether there is substantial evidence in the record... we review the evidence in the record taken as a whole.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.