Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 52 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Larry Melancon v. Texaco, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Larry Melancon v. Texaco, Inc. Anchor | green | “possesses the inherent procedural power to reconsider, rescind, or modify an interlocutory order for cause seen by it to be sufficient.” | 14 |
| 2 | Larry Melancon v. Texaco, Inc. | green | “reconsider, rescind, or modify an interlocutory order for cause seen by it to be sufficient.” | 11 |
| 3 | Larry Melancon v. Texaco, Inc. | green | “possess the inherent procedural power to reconsider, rescind, or modify an interlocutory order for cause seen by it to be sufficient.” | 10 |
| 4 | In Re Diane Self | green | “(1) to correct manifest errors of law or fact upon which judgment is based; (2) the availability of new evidence; (3) the need to prevent manifest injustice; or (4) an intervening change in controlling law.” | 9 |
| 5 | Southern Snow Manufacturing Co. v. Snowizard Holdings, Inc. | green | “when there exists no independent reason for reconsideration other than mere disagreement with a prior order, reconsideration is a waste of judicial time and resources and should not be granted.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.