Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 52 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Scholastic Entertainment, Inc. v. Fox Entertainment Group, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scholastic Entertainment, Inc. v. Fox Entertainment Group, Inc. Anchor | green | “while a party is entitled to notice and an opportunity to respond when a court contemplates dismissing a claim on the merits, it is not so when the dismissal is for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.” | 15 |
| 2 | Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp. | green | “federal jurisdiction exists only when a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff's properly pleaded complaint.” | 13 |
| 3 | Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottley | green | “only when the plaintiff's statement of his own cause of action shows that it is based upon federal law.” | 12 |
| 4 | Karen Logan v. Us Bank National Association | green | “does not create a private right of action allowing plaintiff to enforce its requirements” | 12 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.