Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 52 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. Jeff Blackwood.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. Jeff Blackwood Anchor | green | “fully informed and well-considered,” | 11 |
| 2 | Native Ecosystems Council v. Michael Dombeck | green | “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” | 11 |
| 3 | Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. Jeff Blackwood | green | “a substantial dispute about the size, nature, or effect of the major federal action rather than the existence of opposition to a use.” | 10 |
| 4 | Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn. | green | “although nontreaty fishermen might be subjected to any reasonable state fishing regulation serving any legitimate purpose, treaty fishermen are immune from all regulation save that required for conservation.” | 6 |
| 5 | Erhard v. United States | green | “just as non-indians may continue to take advantage of improvements in fishing techniques, the treaty tribes may, in exercising their rights to take anadromous fish, utilize improvements in traditional fishing methods, such for example as nylon nets and steel hooks.” | 6 |
| 6 | Antoine v. Washington | green | “reasonable and necessary conservation measure” | 5 |
| 7 | Tillamook County v. U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers | green | “briefly provides sufficient evidence and analysis for determining whether to prepare an environmental impact statement or a finding of no significant impact.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.