Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 1,321 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Leonardo S. ORTEZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leonardo S. ORTEZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee Anchor | green | “sufficiently specific to permit the reviewing court to conclude that the alj did not arbitrarily discredit the claimant's testimony.” | 421 |
| 2 | Betty J. DODRILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee | green | “state which . . . testimony is not credible and what evidence suggests the complaints are not credible.” | 194 |
| 3 | Beatriz v. Lounsburry v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security | green | “inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months.” | 163 |
| 4 | Tommasetti v. Astrue | green | “supported by inferences reasonably drawn from the record.” | 134 |
| 5 | Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. Colvin | green | “may not affirm simply by isolating a specific quantum of supporting evidence.” | 133 |
| 6 | Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | green | “supported by substantial evidence in the record, the court may not engage in second-guessing.” | 117 |
| 7 | Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | green | “alj's credibility finding is supported by substantial evidence in the record, the court may not engage in second-guessing.” | 99 |
| 8 | Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | green | “may not engage in second-guessing.” | 60 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.