Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 52 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re TA.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re TA Anchor | green | “we will not disturb a court's finding that termination is in the child's best interest unless it was against the manifest weight of the evidence.” | 14 |
| 2 | In re J.H. | green | “a finding is against the manifest weight of the evidence only if the evidence clearly calls for the opposite finding , such that no reasonable person could arrive at the circuit court's finding on the basis of the evidence in the record .” | 12 |
| 3 | In re J.H. | green | “clearly calls for the opposite finding” | 11 |
| 4 | In re A.R. | green | “can conclude that the court, in the near future, will be able to order the child returned to parental custody.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.