Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 329 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from John C. Norton v. Sam's Club, Wal-Mart Corp., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John C. Norton v. Sam's Club, Wal-Mart Corp., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Anchor | green | “issues not sufficiently argued in the briefs are considered waived and normally will not be addressed on appeal.” | 281 |
| 2 | McLeod v. the Jewish Guild for the Blind | green | “liberally construe pleadings and briefs submitted by pro se litigants, reading such submissions to raise the strongest arguments they suggest,” | 37 |
| 3 | Gerstenbluth v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC | green | “issues not sufficiently argued in the briefs are considered waived and normally will not be addressed on appeal.” | 11 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.