Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 52 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from I.A. Durbin, Inc. v. Jefferson National Bank.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I.A. Durbin, Inc. v. Jefferson National Bank Anchor | green | “trial courts are afforded broad discretion in determining whether to stay or dismiss litigation in order to avoid duplicating a proceeding already pending in another federal court.” | 16 |
| 2 | Construction Aggregates, Ltd. v. Forest Commodities Corporation | green | “a claim arises out of the same transaction or occurrence if there is a 'logical relationship' between the claims.” | 11 |
| 3 | Fred Dalton Brooks v. Warden | green | “places substantial restrictions on the judicial relief that prisoners can seek . . . .” | 8 |
| 4 | Lisa Y.S. West v. Deputy Terry Davis | green | “when a specific provision of the constitution is allegedly infringed, a court must decide the claim in accordance with the terms of that provision rather than under the more general rubric of substantive due process.” | 5 |
| 5 | Bobby Hardwick v. R. Brinson, Chief Mail Clerk, Georgia State Prison, and Joseph S. Hopper, Warden | green | “plaintiff is entitled to have his claim considered but by only one of the courts he had selected” | 3 |
| 6 | Mckinnon v. Talladega County | green | “all defendants at gcd, gdcp, and g.s.p. have denied plaintiff jumu'ah and ta'lim islamic service every week since he entered gdc custody from 10/3/12 to date, and are continuing to deny him such service.” | 3 |
| 7 | James Wright v. Lanson Newsome, Warden | green | “post-deprivation remedies do not satisfy the due process requirement where the deprivation of property is effected pursuant to established state procedure, rather than through random, unauthorized action.” | 3 |
| 8 | James Wright v. Lanson Newsome, Warden | green | “sufficiently charged that the taking was the result of established state procedure” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.