Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 52 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Curtis Blaine Storey v. Burns International Security Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Curtis Blaine Storey v. Burns International Security Services Anchor | green | “serious and tangible enough to alter an employee's compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment.” | 22 |
| 2 | Curtis Blaine Storey v. Burns International Security Services | green | “an action by an employer that is serious and tangible enough to alter an employee's compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment.” | 11 |
| 3 | Curtis Blaine Storey v. Burns International Security Services | green | “defined 'an adverse employment action' under title vii as an action by an employer that is 'serious and tangible enough to alter an employee's compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment.” | 7 |
| 4 | Fasold v. Justice | green | “under the mcdonnell douglas paradigm, an employee must first establish a prima facie case of discrimination, after which the burden shifts to the employer to articulate a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its adverse employment decision.” | 7 |
| 5 | Fasold v. Justice | green | “if the employer articulates one or more such reasons, the aggrieved employee must then proffer evidence that is sufficient to allow a reasonable finder of fact to find by a preponderance of the evidence that the employer's proffered reasons are false or pretextual.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.