Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 52 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Beizer v. Goepfert.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beizer v. Goepfert Anchor | green | “great deference is given to the trial court's findings because the trial court is responsible for weighing the evidence and determining the credibility of witnesses.” | 23 |
| 2 | Kupstis v. Michaud | neutral | “attorney trial referees and factfinders share the same function . . . whose determination of the facts is reviewable in accordance with well established procedures prior to the rendition of judgment by the court.” | 8 |
| 3 | Wilcox Trucking, Inc. v. Mansour Builders, Inc. | green | “there is nothing that is unreasonable, illogical or clearly erroneous in the findings of the fact finder and the reasonable inferences that may be drawn therefrom.” | 7 |
| 4 | Shaw v. L.A. Socci, Inc. | neutral | “function to review the findings of the factfinder initially to determine whether those findings were properly reached on the basis of subordinate facts found” | 6 |
| 5 | Romano v. City of Derby | green | “after reviewing the transcript and testimony of the hearing, the trial court concluded that a sufficient basis existed in the evidence to support the attorney trial referee's findings and therefore concluded that judgment should be rendered for the defendant.” | 5 |
| 6 | Shaw v. L.A. Socci, Inc. | neutral | “review the findings of the factfinder initially to determine whether those findings were properly reached on the basis of subordinate facts found” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.