Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 51 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Goncalves Ex Rel. Goncalves v. Rady Children's Hospital San Diego.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goncalves Ex Rel. Goncalves v. Rady Children's Hospital San Diego Anchor | green | “for a private entity to be 'acting under' a federal officer, the private entity must be involved in 'an effort to assist, or to help carry out, the duties or tasks of the federal superior.” | 9 |
| 2 | Winters v. Diamond Shamrock Chemical Co. | green | “detailed and direct orders to supply a certain product,” | 7 |
| 3 | Durham v. Lockheed Martin Corp. | green | “that its 'broad language is not limitless.” | 7 |
| 4 | Cabalce v. Thomas E. Blanchard & Associates, Inc. | green | “defendants provided the government with detailed safety parameters ..., not the other way around” | 7 |
| 5 | Goncalves Ex Rel. Goncalves v. Rady Children's Hospital San Diego | green | “is not acting as an insurer so much as it is acting as a claims processer, serving as the government's agent while the government takes the place of the typical health insurer in hedging bets.” | 7 |
| 6 | Goncalves Ex Rel. Goncalves v. Rady Children's Hospital San Diego | green | “corporations are persons under section 1442(a)(1).” | 7 |
| 7 | Fidelitad, Inc. v. Insitu, Inc. | green | “(a) it is a 'person' within the meaning of the statute; (b) there is a causal nexus between its actions, taken pursuant to a federal officer's directions, and plaintiff's claims; and (c) it can assert a 'colorable federal defense.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.