Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 51 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sanderson v. Sanderson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sanderson v. Sanderson Anchor | green | “a chancellor's findings of fact will not be disturbed unless manifestly wrong or clearly erroneous.” | 15 |
| 2 | Lowrey v. Lowrey | green | “a chancellor's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.” | 14 |
| 3 | Owen v. Owen | green | “however, the court will not hesitate to reverse if it finds the chancellor's decision is manifestly wrong, or that the court applied an erroneous legal standard.” | 7 |
| 4 | Bowen v. Bowen | green | “it is supported by substantial credible evidence.” | 6 |
| 5 | Sanford v. Sanford | green | “legal questions, however, are reviewed de novo.” | 6 |
| 6 | Bowen v. Bowen | green | “the chancellor's division and distribution will be upheld if it is supported by substantial credible evidence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.