Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 51 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bazemore v. Friday.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bazemore v. Friday Anchor | green | “each week's paycheck that delivers less to a black than to a similarly situated white is a wrong actionable under title vii, regardless of the fact that this pattern was begun prior to the effective date of title vii.” | 21 |
| 2 | Alfred Brown, William King and Willie James Mallett, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Robert R. Sibley, Etc. | green | “this constitutional threshold must be met before any consideration of the typicality of claims or commonality of issues required for procedural reasons by fed.r.civ.p. 23.” | 6 |
| 3 | Peners L. Griffin and Henry L. Dejerinett v. Richard L. Dugger, Etc. | green | “as long as at least one named plaintiff timely filed an eeoc charge, the precondition to a title vii action is met for all other named plaintiffs and class members.” | 6 |
| 4 | Charles ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GADSDEN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellant. Gadsden County, Florida, Defendant | green | “the continuing violation doctrine does not exist to give a second chance to an employee who allowed a legitimate title vii claim to lapse.” | 4 |
| 5 | William T. Thigpen, Jr. v. Larry Justice | neutral | “in determining whether a discriminatory employment practice constitutes a continuing violation, this circuit distinguishes between the present consequence of a one time violation, which does not extend the limitations period, and the continuation of that violation into the prese…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.