Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 51 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Udall v. Tallman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Udall v. Tallman Anchor | green | “when the construction of an administrative regulation rather than a statute is in issue, deference is even more clearly in order.” | 33 |
| 2 | Reliant Energy, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas | green | “be given a large degree of latitude in the methods it uses to accomplish its regulatory function.” | 9 |
| 3 | Sunoco Terminals, Inc. v. Bullock | green | “under the concept of separate entity, the business loss from a corporation can not be transferred to another corporation as a result of a merger or other method of combining two corporations” | 3 |
| 4 | Universal Frozen Foods Co. v. Rylander | green | “tax code requires that a corporation's net taxable earned surplus be calculated solely on that corporation's own financial condition,” | 3 |
| 5 | Upjohn Co. v. Rylander | green | “the legislative intent becomes more clear when we consider that the legislature is presumed to enact a statute with the complete knowledge of existing law and with reference to it.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.