Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 51 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hackett v. Barnhart.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hackett v. Barnhart Anchor | green | “our general practice, which we see no reason to depart from here, is to take a lower tribunal at its word when it declares that it has considered a matter.” | 25 |
| 2 | Snyder v. Ridenour | green | “cir. 1985); united states v. schronce, 727 f.2d 91, 94 (4” | 15 |
| 3 | Brian Reid v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “the commissioner, through the alj and appeals council, stated that the whole record was considered, and, absent evidence to the contrary, we take her at her word.” | 11 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.