Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 51 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Darwin Jay Copeland Anthony Antoine Hartwell.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Darwin Jay Copeland Anthony Antoine Hartwell Anchor | green | “whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 11 |
| 2 | United States v. Charles Hughes (88-1658), Luckett Larry (88-1659), Sanford Hoskow (88-1660), Basem Kandah (88-1661), and Dale Dudley (88-1751) | green | “we are bound to make all reasonable inferences and credibility choices in support of the jury's verdict.” | 10 |
| 3 | United States v. Byron Still | green | “an appellant abandons all issues not raised and argued in its initial brief on appeal.” | 7 |
| 4 | United States v. Philip A. Chance | green | “for purposes of a conviction under 18 u.s.c. 1962 (c) (d), the government need only prove that the enterprise's racketeering activities had a de minimis connection with interstate commerce.” | 6 |
| 5 | United States v. Joshua Hollingsworth | green | “so basic as to be implicit in the fact of a prior conviction.” | 5 |
| 6 | Amber McCombs v. Meijer, Inc., D/B/A Meijer's Supermarkets | green | “the outcome of the trial was not affected by any evidentiary error.” | 4 |
| 7 | United States v. Marcus Franklin (03-2439) Jamaal Clarke (03-2440) | green | “in the statements themselves and with the facts the government sought to establish thereby.” | 4 |
| 8 | United States v. Rachel Shannon Sosebee (03-1923) and Jack P. Farris (03-2219) | green | “in addition, five of our sister circuits have recently addressed the issue of whether booker affects restitution orders. although they rely on different reasoning, all five circuits have uniformly declined to reverse an order of restitution based on the concerns raised in blakel…” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.