Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 51 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cleary v. Philip Morris Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cleary v. Philip Morris Inc. Anchor | green | “if an unjust enrichment claim rests on the same improper conduct alleged in another claim, then the unjust enrichment claim will be tied to this related claim-and, of course, unjust enrichment will stand or fall with the related claim.” | 35 |
| 2 | Holly Vanzant v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Incorpo | green | “that the defendant committed a deceptive or unfair act with the intent that others rely on the deception, that the act occurred in the course of trade or commerce, and that it caused actual damages.” | 10 |
| 3 | Kensington's Wine Auctioneers & Brokers, Inc. v. John Hart Fine Wine, Ltd. | green | “to be eligible for injunctive relief under the deceptive practices act, a plaintiff must show the defendant's conduct will likely cause it to suffer damages in the future.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.