Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Catzin v. Thank You & Good Luck Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Catzin v. Thank You & Good Luck Corp. Anchor | green | “judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comity.” | 22 |
| 2 | Brzak v. United Nations | green | “a plaintiff's federal claims are dismissed before trial, 'the state claims should be dismissed as well.” | 20 |
| 3 | Vaughn v. Phoenix House New York | green | “because the district court properly dismissed the federal claims, the only claims over which it had original jurisdiction, it did not abuse its discretion by declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his state law claims.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.