Topic: an abstract of judgment is not the judgment of conviction; … · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #7133

4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Mitchell.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 People v. Mitchell Anchor
cal · 2001
green “an abstract of judgment is not the judgment of conviction; it does not control if different from the trial court's oral judgment and may not add to or modify the judgment it purports to digest or summarize.” 40
2 People v. Franco
calctapp · 2009
green “to have construed them in a manner that violates the defendant's rights.' we look to the instructions as a whole and the entire record of trial, including the arguments of counsel. we assume that the jurors are” 4
3 People v. Jones
cal · 2001
green “could find a defendant had a 'reasonable opportunity to reflect upon his or her actions' even though the parties never changed physical locations and the parties 'merely' changed positions” 3
4 People v. Wutzke
cal · 2002
green “a consecutive sentence for each offense . . . if the crimes involve separate victims or involve the same victim on separate occasions as defined in subdivision (d) of section 667.6.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check