Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 319 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alan Schmidt v. John Skolas.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alan Schmidt v. John Skolas Anchor | green | “integral to or explicitly relied upon in the complaint,” | 63 |
| 2 | Murray v. Plainfield Rescue Squad | green | “is to discern and effectuate the intent of the legislature.” | 46 |
| 3 | Carteret Properties v. Variety Donuts, Inc. | green | “for the reason that you have committed a breach of that covenant in your lease providing that the store premises aforesaid are 'to be used and occupied only for the retail sale of food and allied products.” | 42 |
| 4 | Carteret Properties v. Variety Donuts, Inc. | green | “specifies the cause of the termination of the tenancy.” | 42 |
| 5 | Carteret Properties v. Variety Donuts, Inc. | green | “to state precisely or in detail, to point out, to particularize, or to designate by words one thing or another.” | 42 |
| 6 | Turner v. Aldens, Inc. | green | “legislative intent can be discerned by background circumstances revealing the evil sought to be remedied and as thus illuminated may be read into the statute by implication with the same effectiveness as though expressly declared therein.” | 42 |
| 7 | McGovern v. Rutgers | green | “silent with respect to the issue at hand,” | 42 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.