Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Edward Thomas Kendrick, III v. State of Tennessee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Edward Thomas Kendrick, III v. State of Tennessee Anchor | green | “the standard of review for rulings on hearsay evidence has multiple layers.” | 19 |
| 2 | Keisling v. Keisling | green | “it necessarily is a question of law” | 13 |
| 3 | State of Tennessee v. Jessie Dotson | green | “expressly adopted and applied the same analysis used to evaluate claims based on the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment.” | 9 |
| 4 | State of Tennessee v. Jessie Dotson | green | “statements . . . by their nature were not testimonial,” | 5 |
| 5 | State v. Deuter | green | “a higher right than that found in the federal constitution.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.