Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hayward v. Hayward.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hayward v. Hayward Anchor | green | “we measure the circumstances of the case against the objective of effectuating economic justice between the parties and achieving a just determination of their property rights.” | 18 |
| 2 | Brubaker v. Brubaker | green | “it is within the province of the trial court to weigh the evidence and decide credibility and this court will not reverse those determinations so long as they are supported by the evidence.” | 10 |
| 3 | Gephart v. Gephart | green | “a person's earning capacity is defined not as an amount which the person could theoretically earn, but as that amount which the person could realistically earn under the circumstances, considering his or her age, health, mental and physical condition and training.” | 8 |
| 4 | Carney, K. v. Carney, D. | green | “unless the law has been overridden or misapplied or the judgment exercised was manifestly unreasonable, or the result of partiality, prejudice, bias, or ill will, as shown by the evidence in the certified record.” | 7 |
| 5 | Brubaker v. Brubaker | green | “we do not lightly find an abuse of discretion, which requires a showing of clear and convincing evidence.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.