Topic: the proper inquiry is, after viewing the evidence most favo… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #7250

5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Troisi.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 State v. Troisi Anchor
ohioctapp · 2008
green “the proper inquiry is, after viewing the evidence most favorably to the prosecution, whether the jury could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.” 19
2 State v. Nevius
· 1947
green “a conclusion which, by means of data founded upon common experience, natural reason draws from facts which are proven.” 15
3 State v. Payne
ohioctapp · 2014
green “when an inference, which forms the basis of a conviction, is drawn solely from another inference and that inference is not supported by any additional facts or inferences drawn from other established facts, the conviction is improper.” 6
4 State v. Payne
ohioctapp · 2014
green “circumstantial evidence has been defined as testimony not grounded on actual personal knowledge or observation of the facts in controversy, but of other facts from which inferences are drawn, showing indirectly the facts sought to be established.” 6
5 State v. Armstrong
ohioctapp · 2016
green “it consequently follows that 'when circumstantial evidence forms the basis of a conviction, that evidence must prove collateral facts and circumstances, from which the existence of a primary fact may be rationally inferred according to common experience.” 4

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check