Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 49 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brand Coupon Network, LLC v. Catalina Marketing Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brand Coupon Network, LLC v. Catalina Marketing Corp. Anchor | green | “must limit itself to the contents of the pleadings, including attachments thereto.” | 35 |
| 2 | Severance v. Patterson | green | “a well-pleaded complaint may proceed even if it strikes a savvy judge that actual proof of the alleged facts is improbable, and 'that a recovery is very remote and unlikely.” | 14 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.