Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 49 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Karenev v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Karenev v. State Anchor | green | “a defendant may not raise for the first time on appeal a facial challenge to the constitutionality of a statute.” | 37 |
| 2 | Lumsden v. State | green | “if the defendant answers that he is not guilty, such plea shall be entered upon the minutes of the court; if he refuses to answer, the plea of not guilty shall in like manner be entered.” | 4 |
| 3 | Coyle v. State | green | “she was innocent of violating the contract with the state of texas, because no contract exists” | 4 |
| 4 | Saldana v. State | green | “functionally indistinguishable.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.